Stakeholder Engagement Based Moral Hazard Analysis Model in FPSO-Tanker Oil Transfer
Downloads
This study aims to address moral hazard risks in FPSO-tanker oil transfer operations by introducing a semi-quantitative model rooted in stakeholder engagement theory. The model, named SEMHAM (Stakeholder Engagement-based Moral Hazard Analysis Model), incorporates four engagement indicators to calculate the total involvement percentage (PTI): Occurrence Frequency Value (OFV), Responsibility Weight Value (RWV), Critical Role Value (CRV), and Process Impact Value (PIV) to calculate the Total Involvement Percentage (PTI). This metric quantifies the behavioral influence of each stakeholder in the offloading process. Using operational data from 17 offshore zones based on Pertamina's 2023 report, eight primary stakeholder roles were evaluated using a weighted activity matrix. The findings indicate that FPSO Crew and Ship Crew possess the highest PTI scores, signifying greater control and potential risk, whereas administrative actors such as agents and port authorities were identified as lower-risk participants. The SEMHAM model facilitates risk classification and recommends appropriate digital oversight, including IoT-based monitoring, smart contracts, and role-based dashboards. This approach enables the integration of behavioral risk metrics into digital governance systems, thus supporting real-time operational monitoring. The model also demonstrates potential scalability to more complex offshore energy domains, such as LNG terminals and deepwater operations, enabling broader stakeholder governance beyond the current FPSO-tanker context.
Downloads
[1] Castro, P. M. (2025). Maritime inventory routing with speed optimization: A MIQCP formulation for a tanker fleet servicing FPSO units. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 192, 108889. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108889.
[2] Palippui, H. (2022). Digitalization of Indonesian Offloading Management Systems from FPSO to Shuttle Tanker. Maritime Park: Journal of Maritime Technology and Society. doi:10.20956/maritimepark.v1i3.23618.
[3] Chen, C., & Li, Y. (2023). Real-time tracking and dynamic berthing information extraction system with 2D LiDAR data. Ocean Engineering, 276. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114181.
[4] Gaidai, O., Cao, Y., Xu, X., & Xing, Y. (2023). Offloading operation bivariate extreme response statistics for FPSO vessel. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 4695. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31533-8.
[5] Saveleva, E., Svitelman, V., Blinov, P., & Valetov, D. (2021). Sensitivity analysis and model calibration as a part of the model development process in radioactive waste disposal safety assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 210. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107521.
[6] Ali, N. M., Salim, S. M. S., Mansur, M., & Shahiri, H. I. (2024). Moral Hazard Behaviors and Mitigation Strategies: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 58(1), 1-18. doi:10.17576/JEM-2024-5801-01.
[7] Ahmad, D. S., Bhatti, M. A. A., & Imam, M. A. (2023). Balancing Control and Collaboration: Project Manager Accountability in Multi-Layered Governance Systems. Journal of Professional Research in Social Sciences, 10(2), 134–155. doi:10.58932/mula0018.
[8] Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 251–267. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-5355-y.
[9] Fugate, D. L. (2007). Neuromarketing: a layman's look at neuroscience and its potential application to marketing practice. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(7), 385-394. doi:10.1108/07363760710834807.
[10] Tunçel, A. L., Akyuz, E., & Arslan, O. (2023). Quantitative risk analysis for operational transfer processes of maritime pilots. Maritime Policy and Management, 50(3), 375–389. doi:10.1080/03088839.2021.2009133.
[11] Shee Weng, L. (2025). Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Integrating Sustainability Reporting, Governance, and Corporate Responsibility. SSRN (Preprint), 1-24. doi:10.2139/ssrn.5137976.
[12] Durrani, U. K., Akpinar, M., Fatih Adak, M., Talha Kabakus, A., Maruf Ozturk, M., & Saleh, M. (2024). A Decade of Progress: A Systematic Literature Review on the Integration of AI in Software Engineering Phases and Activities (2013-2023). IEEE Access, 12, 171185–171204. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3488904.
[13] Zulqarnain, M. (2015). Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill Scenarios Development and Their Associated Risk Assessment. Ph.D. Thesis, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, United States.
[14] Pessoa, G., Ponkratov, V., Philippov, D., Shvyreva, O., Kuznetsov, N., Elyakova, I., … Bloshenko, T. (2024). Energy Price Impact on BRIC Stock Markets: A Granger Causality Analysis. Emerging Science Journal, 8(6), 2385–2403. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-06-015.
[15] Van Pham, T., & Tran, T. D. (2025). Unveiling the Decision-Making Process of Digital Transformation Adoption from a Behavioral-Cognitive Perspective: Mediating and Moderating Mechanisms. Emerging Science Journal, 9(1), 419–432. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-01-023.
[16] Poetz, A. (2012). “Risk Is a Social Thing, Not Just a Mathematical Thing:” A Model for Stakeholder Engagement in Decision Making. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 3(2), 1-32. doi:10.1515/1944-4079.1105.
[17] Tung, A. (2020). A Comparison of Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Offshore Decommissioning Projects in the United Kingdom and Australian Landscape. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC-30824-MS. doi:10.4043/30824-ms.
[18] Young, S. F., Steelman, L. A., Pita, M. D., & Gallo, J. (2020). Role-based engagement: scale development and validation. Journal of Management & Organization, 30(2), 248–268. doi:10.1017/jmo.2020.30.
[19] Joubert, M., & Roodt, G. (2019). Conceptualising and measuring employee engagement as a role-related, multi-level construct. Acta Commercii, 19(1), 605. doi:10.4102/ac.v19i1.605.
[20] Jazairy, A., Lenhardt, J., & von Haartman, R. (2017). Improving logistics performance in cross-border 3PL relationships. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(5), 491–513. doi:10.1080/13675567.2017.1306036.
[21] Vedat, K. (2023). FlexDelivery – Integrated Logistics in the Offshore Sector. Paper presented at the ADIPEC, Abu Dhabi, UAE. doi:10.2118/217024-ms.
[22] Kujala, J., Sachs, S., Leinonen, H., Heikkinen, A., & Laude, D. (2022). Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future. Business & Society, 61(5), 1136–1196. doi:10.1177/00076503211066595.
[23] PT. Pertamina Patra Niaga (2023). Annual Report 2023, PT. Pertamina Patra Niaga, Central Jakarta, Indonesia. Available: Available online: https://pertaminapatraniaga.com/page/laporan-tahunan (accessed on September 2025).
[24] Uddin, S., Ong, S., & Matous, P. (2023). Stakeholder engagement variability across public, private and public-private partnership projects: A data-driven network-based analysis. PLOS ONE, 18(1), e0279916. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279916.
[25] Bahadorestani, A., Naderpajouh, N., & Sadiq, R. (2020). Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118402. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118402.
[26] Devold, H. Oil and gas production handbook an introduction to oil and gas production, transport, refining and petrochemical industry. ABB Oil and Gas, Zurich, Switzerland.
[27] Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., De Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner-Ries, D., ... & Van Delden, H. (2018). A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?. Restoration Ecology, 26, S7-S17. doi:10.1111/rec.12541.
[28] Nederhand, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2019). Stakeholder involvement in public–private partnerships: Its influence on the innovative character of projects and on project performance. Administration & Society, 51(8), 1200-1226. doi:10.1177/0095399716684887.
[29] De Schepper, S., Dooms, M., & Haezendonck, E. (2014). Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in Public–Private Partnerships: A mixed experience. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), 1210-1222. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.006.
[30] Bai, L., Kang, S., Li, F., Zhang, Z., Li, J., & Luo, X. (2024). External stakeholder risk response strategies selection in project portfolio. Heliyon, 10(11), e31709. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31709.
[31] Rychlik, A., Semko, O., Bedrii, D., Marshak, O., & Nesterenko, A. (2024). Information System for Management of Information Risks in Digital Transformation Projects. Information Technology for Education, Science, and Technics. ITEST 2024. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71804-5_1.
[32] Liu, Z., Li, A., Sun, Z., Shi, G., & Meng, X. (2022). Digital Twin-Based Risk Control during Prefabricated Building Hoisting Operations. Sensors, 22(7), 2522. doi:10.3390/s22072522.
[33] Otoom, S. (2025). Risk auditing for Digital Twins in cyber physical systems: A systematic review. Journal of Cyber Security and Risk Auditing, 2025(1), 22–35. doi:10.63180/jcsra.thestap.2025.1.3.
[34] Shibahathulla, T. K., Ali, M. A., Gayyor, O., & Ghaffari, A. Z. (2024). The role of automated controls and streamlined compliance in managing risks in digital finance. International Journal of Financial Engineering, 11(03), 2443004. doi:10.1142/s2424786324430047.
[35] Olaniyi, O. O., Omogoroye, O. O., Olaniyi, F. G., Alao, A. I., & Oladoyinbo, T. O. (2024). CyberFusion Protocols: Strategic Integration of Enterprise Risk Management, ISO 27001, and Mobile Forensics for Advanced Digital Security in the Modern Business Ecosystem. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 26(6), 31–49. doi:10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i61160.
[36] Bevilacqua, M., Bottani, E., Ciarapica, F. E., Costantino, F., Di Donato, L., Ferraro, A., Mazzuto, G., Monteriù, A., Nardini, G., Ortenzi, M., Paroncini, M., Pirozzi, M., Prist, M., Quatrini, E., Tronci, M., & Vignali, G. (2020). Digital Twin Reference Model Development to Prevent Operators’ Risk in Process Plants. Sustainability, 12(3), 1088. doi:10.3390/su12031088.
[37] San-Jose, L., Gonzalo, J. F., & Ruiz-Roqueñi, M. (2022). The management of moral hazard through the implementation of a Moral Compliance Model (MCM). European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1), 100182. doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100182.
[38] Mokhtari, K., Ren, J., Roberts, C., & Wang, J. (2011). Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 192(2), 465–475. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.035.
[39] Dhanistha, W. L., Anggara, D. R., & Rosyid, F. D. M. (2025). Fuzzy-FMEA for Risk Analysis: Decommissioning an Offshore Manifold Wellhead Platform. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1473(1), 012040. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1473/1/012040.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
