Motivation Profiles, Personal Values, and Personality Traits: The Interplay in Research Management and Administration
Downloads
This study addresses a significant gap in the literature by examining the motivation profiles of Research Managers and Administrators (RMAs) and their correlation with personal values and personality traits. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the research sought to propose and validate a conceptual framework specifically for RMAs, introducing the distinct profile of outcome-driven motivation. Empirical data were collected using a quantitative, cross-sectional survey (N=1,095 valid responses) distributed via snowball sampling. The methodological rigor was demonstrated through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), with highly suitable data (KMO=0.915, p<0.001) and high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.757 to 0.880). The EFA validated the construct of three distinct motivation profiles. RMAs were found to exhibit a predominantly autonomous (intrinsic) drive, confirmed by the highest mean score among the profiles, with statistically significant differences between all three types of motivation. This intrinsic motivation aligns with personal values that emphasize benevolence and universalism while downplaying power and tradition, and personality traits showing high conscientiousness, openness, and agreeableness. This work extends the use of SDT in Science and Technology Studies by validating a specific measurement scale for RMA motivation profiles. The results offer practical guidance, supporting the need for flexible, tailored motivational strategies and policies that enhance intrinsic factors such as autonomy and competency to boost RMA performance.
Downloads
[1] Eriksson, M., Lilliesköld, J., Jonsson, N., & Novosel, D. (2002). How to manage complex, multinational randd projects successfully. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 14(2), 53–60. doi:10.1080/10429247.2002.11415163.
[2] Lippe, S., & Vom Brocke, J. (2016). Situational Project Management for Collaborative Research Projects. Project Management Journal, 47(1), 76–96. doi:10.1002/pmj.21561.
[3] Verbaan, E., & Cox, A. M. (2014). Occupational Sub-Cultures, Jurisdictional Struggle and Third Space: Theorising Professional Service Responses to Research Data Management. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3–4), 211–219. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.008.
[4] Fowler, N., Lindahl, M., & Sköld, D. (2015). The projectification of university research: A study of resistance and accommodation of project management tools & techniques. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 8(1), 9–32. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-10-2013-0059.
[5] Agostinho, M., Moniz Alves, C., Aresta, S., Borrego, F., Borlido-Santos, J., Cortez, J., Lima Costa, T., António Lopes, J., Moreira, S., Santos, J., Trindade, M., Varela, C., & Vidal, S. (2020). The interface of science: the case for a broader definition of research management. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 24(1), 19–27. doi:10.1080/13603108.2018.1543215.
[6] Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Varela, C., & Kerridge, S. (2021). Professionals at the interface of science: is there more than meets the eye? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 25(3), 100–105. doi:10.1080/13603108.2021.1881842.
[7] Wedekind, G. K., & Philbin, S. P. (2018). Research and Grant Management: The Role of the Project Management Office (PMO) in a European Research Consortium Context. Journal of Research Administration, 49(1), 43–62.
[8] Bayley, J., & Phipps, D. (2019). Extending the concept of research impact literacy: levels of literacy, institutional role and ethical considerations. Emerald Open Research, 1, 14. doi:10.35241/emeraldopenres.13140.2.
[9] Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(June), 485–516. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142105.
[10] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
[11] Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322.
[12] Chen, C., Zhang, K. S., Chen, C. M., & Pao, L. S. (2023). The Impact Between Motivational Potential Characteristics of Job and Job Satisfaction: A Moderation Model of Personality Traits in a High-Tech Industry. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 14(1), 1–19. doi:10.4018/IJABIM.325650.
[13] Sato, N., Watanabe, K., Nishi, D., & Kawakami, N. (2021). Associations Between Personal Values and Work Engagement: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Representative Community Sample. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(6), E335–E340. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002209.
[14] Veage, S., Ciarrochi, J., Deane, F. P., Andresen, R., Oades, L. G., & Crowe, T. P. (2014). Value congruence, importance and success and in the workplace: Links with well-being and burnout amongst mental health practitioners. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(4), 258–264. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.004.
[15] Katoh, S., Aalbers, R. H. L., & Sengoku, S. (2021). Effects and interactions of researcher’s motivation and personality in promoting interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(22), 12502. doi:10.3390/su132212502.
[16] Santos, J. M. R. C. A. (2021). Management of public–private R&D projects in Higher Education: key trends and issues. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 25(3), 106–112. doi:10.1080/13603108.2021.1894616.
[17] Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Varela, C., & Martínez-Galán, E. (2022). A Framework for the Management of Research and Innovation Projects in Academic Settings. Journal of Research Administration, 53(2), 60–84.
[18] Fontes, C., & Franco, M. (2025). Cooperative research and development projects: researchers’ motivations for participation and the benefits and barriers they encounter. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 19(1), 73–98. doi:10.1108/apjie-05-2024-0109.
[19] Sachau, D. A. (2007). Resurrecting the motivation-hygiene theory: Herzberg and the positive psychology movement. Human Resource Development Review, 6(4), 377–393. doi:10.1177/1534484307307546.
[20] Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-Determination in a Work Organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 580–590. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580.
[21] Reinholt, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Why a central network position isn’t enough: The role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1277–1297. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0007.
[22] Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3.
[23] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
[24] Zhang, Z., Ni, G., Lin, H., Li, Z., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Linking empowering leadership to work-related well-being and project citizenship behavior in the construction context: a self-determination perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(2), 232–257. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-10-2021-0288.
[25] Van Iddekinge, C. H., Aguinis, H., Mackey, J. D., & DeOrtentiis, P. S. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of the Interactive, Additive, and Relative Effects of Cognitive Ability and Motivation on Performance. Journal of Management, 44(1), 249–279. doi:10.1177/0149206317702220.
[26] Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Mondejar, R., & Chu, C. W. L. (2015). Accounting for the influence of overall justice on job performance: Integrating self-determination and social exchange theories. Journal of Management Studies, 52(2), 231–252. doi:10.1111/joms.12067.
[27] Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016). Linking servant leadership to individual performance: Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction. Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 124–141. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004.
[28] Santaoja, M. (2022). Insect Affects: A Study on the Motivations of Amateur Entomologists and Implications for Citizen Science. Science and Technology Studies, 35(1), 58–79. doi:10.23987/sts.107703.
[29] Lin, Y. W., Bates, J., & Goodale, P. (2016). Co-observing the weather, co-predicting the climate: Human factors in building infrastructures for crowdsourced data. Science and Technology Studies, 29(3), 10–27. doi:10.23987/sts.59199.
[30] Maxim, L. (2018). More than a scientific movement: Socio-political influences on green chemistry research in the United States and France. Science and Technology Studies, 31(3), 24–46. doi:10.23987/sts.60243.
[31] Basińska, B. A., Leja, K., & Szuflita-Żurawska, M. (2019). Positive management of universities: A model of motivation to strive for scientific excellence. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 238–250. doi:10.15678/EBER.2019.070313.
[32] Deemer, E. D., Ogas, J. P., Barr, A. C., Bowdon, R. D., Hall, M. C., Paula, S., Capobianco, B. M., & Lim, S. (2022). Scientific Research Identity Development Need Not Wait Until College: Examining the Motivational Impact of a Pre-college Authentic Research Experience. Research in Science Education, 52(5), 1481–1496. doi:10.1007/s11165-021-09994-6.
[33] Dubnjakovic, A. (2017). Information Seeking Motivation Scale development: a self-determination perspective. Journal of Documentation, 73(5), 1034–1052. doi:10.1108/JD-03-2017-0032.
[34] Burton, K. D., Lydon, J. E., D’Alessandro, D. U., & Koestner, R. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 750–762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.750.
[35] Alberts, L., Lyngs, U., & Lukoff, K. (2024). Designing for Sustained Motivation: A Review of Self-Determination Theory in Behaviour Change Technologies. Interacting with Computers, 1–22. doi:10.1093/iwc/iwae040.
[36] Sobral, F., Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. (2021). The temporary agency worker’s motivation profile analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6779. doi:10.3390/ijerph18136779.
[37] Schmid, B., & Adams, J. (2008). Motivation in Project Management: The Project Manager’s Perspective. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 60–71. doi:10.1002/pmj.20042.
[38] Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Ndiaye, A., Colombat, P., & Fouquereau, E. (2020). A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(4), 988–1030. doi:10.1111/joop.12322.
[39] Pinto, L. F. S., & dos Santos, C. D. (2018). Motivations of crowdsourcing contributors. Innovation and Management Review, 15(1), 58–72. doi:10.1108/INMR-02-2018-004.
[40] Tóth-Király, I., Morin, A. J. S., Bőthe, B., Rigó, A., & Orosz, G. (2021). Toward an Improved Understanding of Work Motivation Profiles. Applied Psychology, 70(3), 986–1017. doi:10.1111/apps.12256.
[41] Trindade, M., & Agostinho, M. (2014). Research management in Portugal: A quest for professional identity. Research Management Review, 20(1), 1-8.
[42] Brandão, A. S., & Santos, J. M. R. C. A. (2023). On the societal impact of publicly funded Circular Bioeconomy research in Europe. Research Evaluation, 32(2), 441–457. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvad002.
[43] Chen, C. X., Zhang, J., & Gilal, F. G. (2019). Composition of motivation profiles at work using latent analysis: Theory and evidence. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 811–824. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S210830.
[44] Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A Structural Equation Test of the Value-Attitude-Behavior Hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 638–646. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638.
[45] Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (1999). A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society and Natural Resources, 12(6), 523–537. doi:10.1080/089419299279425.
[46] Olver, J. J., & Mooradian, T. A. (2003). Personality traits and personal values: A conceptual and empirical integration. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 109–125. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00145-9.
[47] Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(C), 1–65. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6.
[48] Schwartz, S. (2012). Toward refining the theory of basic human values. Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences, 9783531188980, 39–46. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-18898-0_6.
[49] Rickaby, M., Glass, J., Mills, G., & McCarthy, S. (2017). Exploring alignment of personal values in a complex, multi-organisation construction project environment. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM - 33rd Annual Conference 2017, Proceeding, September 2017, 94–103.
[50] van der Sluijs, R., & Silvius, G. (2023). Exploring the Values of a Sustainable Project Manager. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(10). doi:10.3390/su15108006.
[51] Modranský, R., & Lajčin, D. (2021). Correlation of motivation and value orientation of project managers. Emerging Science Journal, 5(3), 350–366. doi:10.28991/esj-2021-01282.
[52] Jeong, E., Jackson, C., Dowthwaite, L., Johnson, C., & Trouille, L. (2024). How Personal Value Orientations Influence Behaviors in Digital Citizen Science. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW1), 1–25. doi:10.1145/3637341.
[53] De Almeida, F. J. R., & De Azevedo Sobral, F. J. B. (2009). The human values system of Brazilian executives: Adaptation of the PVQ scale for studying personal values in Brazil. Revista de Administracao Mackenzie, 10(3), 101–126. doi:10.1590/S1678-69712009000300007.
[54] Lu, H., & Zhang, X. (2023). Developing sustainable career paths as teacher-researchers in a changing academic landscape: A tale of two EFL teachers in China. PLoS ONE, 18(5), 1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0285363.
[55] Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797–807. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797.
[56] Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500.
[57] Kuper, N., Modersitzki, N., Phan, L. V., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2021). The dynamics, processes, mechanisms, and functioning of personality: An overview of the field. British Journal of Psychology, 112(1), 1–51. doi:10.1111/bjop.12486.
[58] Stamate, A. N., Denis, P. L., & Sauvé, G. (2024). How Cognitive Ability Shapes Personality Differentiation in Real Job Candidates: Insights from a Large-Scale Study. Journal of Intelligence, 12(3), 34. doi:10.3390/jintelligence12030034.
[59] Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. University of South Florida, Florida, United States.
[60] Seiler, S., Lent, B., Pinkowska, M., & Pinazza, M. (2012). An integrated model of factors influencing project managers’ motivation - Findings from a Swiss Survey. International Journal of Project Management, 30(1), 60–72. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.002.
[61] Marnewick, C., Silvius, G., & Schipper, R. (2019). Exploring patterns of sustainability stimuli of project managers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(18), 5016. doi:10.3390/su11185016.
[62] Kerridge, S., Ajai-Ajagbe, P., Kiel, C., Shambrook, J., & Wakefield, B. (2023). RAAAP-2 Datasets (17 linked datasets): Figshare, Version 2. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.18972935.v2.
[63] Schwartz, S. H. (2021). A Repository of Schwartz Value Scales with Instructions and an Introduction. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2), 1–11. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1173.
[64] Moura, R. L. de, Carneiro, T. C. J., Dias, T. D. L., & Oliveira, B. S. (2019). Traços de personalidade de gerentes de projetos: diferenças de conhecimentos, experiência profissional e setor de atuação. Revista de Administração Da UFSM, 12(4), 767–784. doi:10.5902/1983465922096.
[65] Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93.
[66] Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Varela, C., & Kerridge, S. (2024). Who Are the Professionals at the Interface of Science Working at Research Funding, Science Policy Making, and Similar Organisations? Journal of Research Administration, 55(3), 29–57.
[67] Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1), 4–11. doi:10.12691/ajams-9-1-2.
[68] Hundleby, J. D., & Nunnally, J. C. (1968). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, United States.
[69] Robinson, N. C. (2022). For Love or Money: Intrinsic Motivation in The Global Project Team. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(6), 56–62. doi:10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.6.1699.
[70] Tyulkubayeva, A. K., Nurseiytova, G. B., & Sugirova, G. S. (2023). Motivation in Project Management: Systematic Review of the Literature. Economy: Strategy and Practice, 18(3), 110–124. doi:10.51176/1997-9967-2023-3-110-124.
[71] Alaghbari, W., Sultan, B., & Al-Yousfi, S. Q. (2020). The influence of motivation factors on project performance in construction projects in Yemen. Queen Arwa University Journal, 25(25), 25. doi:10.58963/qausrj.v1i25.102.
[72] Nicklich, M., Braun, T., & Fortwengel, J. (2020). Forever a profession in the making? the intermediate status of project managers in Germany. Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(3), 374–394. doi:10.1093/jpo/joaa020.
[73] Beecham, S., Baddoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H., & Sharp, H. (2008). Motivation in Software Engineering: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9–10), 860–878. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.09.004.
[74] Werner, K., Zaika, Y., Pavlov, A. K., Lidström, S., Pope, A., Badhe, R., Brückner, M., & Cristini, L. (2019). Project and community management in polar sciences - Challenges and opportunities. Advances in Geosciences, 46, 25–43. doi:10.5194/adgeo-46-25-2019.
[75] Locke, E. A., & Schattke, K. (2019). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Time for Expansion and Clarification. Motivation Science, 5(4), 277–290. doi:10.1037/mot0000116.
[76] Nzabitondera, B., & Bugingo, E. (2024). Effect of Employee Motivation Practices on Projects Performance in Health Projects: A Case of Projects Implemented in Ruhengeri Referral Hospital, Musanze District, Rwanda. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(2), 65–77. doi:10.51867/ajernet.5.2.7.
[77] Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The Benefits of Benevolence: Basic Psychological Needs, Beneficence, and the Enhancement of Well-Being. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 750–764. doi:10.1111/jopy.12215.
[78] Steel, R. P., Bishop, N. C., & Taylor, I. M. (2021). The effect of autonomous and controlled motivation on self-control performance and the acute cortisol response. Psychophysiology, 58(11), 1–12. doi:10.1111/psyp.13915.
[79] Hagger, M. S., Hardcastle, S. J., Chater, A., Mallett, C., Pal, S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2014). Autonomous and controlled motivational regulations for multiple health-related behaviors: between- and within-participants analyses. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2(1), 565–601. doi:10.1080/21642850.2014.912945.
[80] Zhang, X., Noels, K., & Sugita-McEown, M. (2022). The Importance of an Autonomy-Supportive Workplace and Engaged Students for Language Teachers’ Self-Determination and Engagement. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 4(1), 1–25. doi:10.52598/jpll/4/1/7.
[81] Paumier, D., & Chanal, J. (2022). The antecedents and consequences of autonomous and controlled motivation: Domain specificity and motivational sequence at the situational level. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(September), 1–19. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987582.
[82] Audet, É. C., Levine, S. L., Metin, E., Koestner, S., & Barcan, S. (2021). Zooming their way through university: Which Big 5 traits facilitated students’ adjustment to online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 180, 110969. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110969.
[83] Komarraju, M., & Karau, S. J. (2005). The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(3), 557–567. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.013.
[84] Feng, R., Xie, Y., & Wu, J. (2023). How is personality related to research performance? The mediating effect of research engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257166.
[85] Fuertes, A. M. de C., Fernández, J. B., Mata, M. de los Á. G., Gómez, A. R., & Pascual, R. G. (2020). Relationship between personality and academic motivation in education degrees students. Education Sciences, 10(11), 1–14. doi:10.3390/educsci10110327.
[86] Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C. Y., & Stark, S. E. (2014). Openness to experience: Its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 29–45. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.806328.
[87] Wilmot, M. P., Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-mueller, J. D., & Ones, D. S. (2019). Supplemental Material for Extraversion Advantages at Work: A Quantitative Review and Synthesis of the Meta-Analytic Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(12), 1447–1470. doi:10.1037/apl0000415.supp.
[88] Russo, D., Hanel, P. H. P., Altnickel, S., & van Berkel, N. (2023). Satisfaction and performance of software developers during enforced work from home in the COVID-19 pandemic. Empirical Software Engineering, 28(2), 53. doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10293-z.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
