Public Service Provisions for Land Resource Planning

Teeraphat Kitjarak; Shubham Pathak; Xinlin Qi; Thussaneeya Boripis

doi:10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-01-021

Authors

Teeraphat Kitjarak Public Administration Program in Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Phetchabun Rajabhat University,, Thailand
Shubham Pathak School of Accountancy and Finance, Center of Excellence in Sustainable Disaster Management (CESDM), Walailak University, Thai Buri, Tha Sala and 80160,, Thailand
Xinlin Qi School of Marxism, Hezhou University, 3261 Xiaohe Avenue, Babu District, Hezhou, 542899,, China
Thussaneeya Boripis
Thussaneeya.bo@wu.ac.th
School of Political Science and Public Administration, Walailak University, Thai Buri,, Thailand

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): February

Research Articles

Downloads

PDF

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

This study explored the intricate nexus between public service provision and land use planning, specifically focusing on the conservation of local plant species in Tambon Khao Phanom, Amphoe Khao Phanom, Krabi Province. The research aimed to explore, understand, and analyze Thailand's land use resources, planning, and implementation. This study employed a multi-method research approach to gather an exhaustive set of data and insights. The researcher collected data from documentation research and secondary data sources in this research study. Based on the grounded theory, this research adopts the triangulation method. The data analysis was done using the 5P model and strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities. This multidisciplinary approach integrates the one-map method with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The findings depict the lack of adequate implementation of government policies and awareness among the landholders, which are required for sustainable community development. This study underscores the critical synergy between public service delivery and land use planning, highlighting their collective potential to advance community well-being and sustainable development.

Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-01-021

Full Text: PDF

PGCP. (2024). Ultimate Goal. Plant Genetic Conservation Project Office (PGCP), Bangkok, Thailand. Available online: http://www.rspg.or.th/rspg_eng/ (accessed on January 2025).

Yulianti, D., & Fitriansyah, A. (2024). Employment and Skill Development Initiatives in the Labor Markets: The Cases of Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Policy Studies, 39(1), 41–55. doi:10.52372/jps39104.

Enoguanbhor, E. C., Gollnow, F., Walker, B. B., Nielsen, J. O., & Lakes, T. (2022). Simulating Urban Land Expansion in the Context of Land Use Planning in the Abuja City-Region, Nigeria. GeoJournal, 87(3), 1479–1497. doi:10.1007/s10708-020-10317-x.

Liu, N., & Abdullah, J. (2023). GIS and RS technology were used to analyze the changes of land use types in the main urban areas of Chongqing. International Conference on Geographic Information and Remote Sensing Technology (GIRST 2022), 12552, 104. doi:10.1117/12.2667628.

Posuk, S., Kajita, Y., & Petchsasithon, A. (2018). Comparative analysis of city planning and land use change in Bangkok, Thailand, by using remote sensing and GIS. MATEC Web of Conferences, 192, 2064. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201819202064.

Medina, G., Isley, C., & Arbuckle, J. (2020). Iowa Farm Environmental Leaders' Perspectives on the U.S. Farm Bill Conservation Programs. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 497943. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.497943.

Chigbu, U. E., Ntihinyurwa, P. D., de Vries, W. T., & Ngenzi, E. I. (2019). Why tenure responsive land-use planning matters: Insights for land use consolidation for food security in Rwanda. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1354. doi:10.3390/ijerph16081354.

Phillips, P. M., & Joí£o, E. (2017). Land use planning and the ecosystem approach: An evaluation of case study planning frameworks against the Malawi Principles. Land Use Policy, 68, 460–480. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.006.

Toivonen, T., Kuusterä, J., Jalkanen, J., Kukkala, A., Lehtomäki, J., Aalto, S., & Moilanen, A. (2021). Spatial Conservation Prioritisation as Part of a General Land Use Planning Process. In Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-182680/v1.

Dyachia, Z. S., Permana, A. S., Ho, C. S., Baba, A. N., & Agboola, O. P. (2017). Implications of Present Land Use Plan on Urban Growth and Environmental Sustainability in a Sub Saharan Africa City. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 4(2). doi:10.11113/ijbes.v4.n2.181.

Faria, M. A., Tonmoy, M. E. M., & Haque, A. (2023). Land use classification system in Bangladesh: Inconsistencies, their planning implications, and the way forward. GeoScape, 17(2), 89–117. doi:10.2478/geosc-2023-0007.

Kgobe, F. K. L., & Mamokhere, J. (2021). The Value of Public Participation in Land-Use Planning for Redeeming Congestion in South African Municipalities. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 26, 17–31. doi:10.47577/tssj.v26i1.5020.

Nahrin, K. (2020). Environmental area conservation through urban planning: case study in Dhaka. Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law, 12(1), 55–71. doi:10.1108/JPPEL-11-2018-0033.

Chang, Y. C., & Ko, T. T. (2014). An interactive dynamic multi-objective programming model to support better land use planning. Land Use Policy, 36, 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.009.

Zhang, W., & Huang, B. (2015). Soil erosion evaluation in a rapidly urbanizing city (Shenzhen, China) and implementation of spatial land-use optimization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(6), 4475–4490. doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3454-y.

Duan, Y., Tang, J., Li, Z., Yang, Y., Dai, C., Qu, Y., & Lv, H. (2022). Optimal Planning and Management of Land Use in River Source Region: A Case Study of Songhua River Basin, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6610 10 3390 19116610. doi:10.3390/ijerph19116610.

Pahuluan, A., Soeprobowati, T. R., & Hadiyanto, H. (2017). Environmental carrying capacity based on land balance for evaluation planning of spatial and regional in Solok regency, West Sumatra. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 18(3), 22–30. doi:10.12911/22998993/69360.

Amelia, V., Sinaga, S., & Bhermana, A. (2021). Developing Integrated Web-based Information System for Land Resources to Support Agricultural Land-use Planning (A Case Study of the Gunung Mas Regency, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia). Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(1). doi:10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.1.27.

Gerber, J. D., Nahrath, S., & Hartmann, T. (2017). The strategic use of time-limited property rights in land-use planning: Evidence from Switzerland. Environment and Planning A, 49(7), 1684–1703. doi:10.1177/0308518X17701916.

Huang, Q., Liu, Y., Li, M., Mao, K., Li, F., Chen, Z., Chen, C., & Hu, W. (2012). Thematic maps for county-level land use planning in contemporary China. Journal of Maps, 8(2), 185–188. doi:10.1080/17445647.2012.694272.

Hyndman, N., & McKillop, D. (2018). Public services and charities: Accounting, accountability and governance at a time of change. British Accounting Review, 50(2), 143–148. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2018.01.001.

bE-Open. (2024). Public ethics and accountability. BE OPEN project Open Science in Transport. Available online: https://www.beopen-congress.eu/en/1-cat-public-ethics-and-accountability.html (accessed on January 2025).

Syahrani, M., Hernawaty, H., & Winarno, A. (2022). The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation and Normative Commitment. Journal of Leadership in Organizations, 4(1). doi:10.22146/jlo.70614.

Zainun, N. F. H., Johari, J., & Adnan, Z. (2021). Machiavellianism, locus of control, moral identity, and ethical leadership among public service leaders in Malaysia: the moderating effect of ethical role modelling. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(9–10), 1108–1133. doi:10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0289.

Sahid, A., Amirullah, I., Yusriadi, Azis, A., Rachman, A. A., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2019). Application of Bureaucratic Accountability in Public Service. Eastern Regional Organization for Public Administration Conference (EROPA 2018), 87-90. doi:10.2991/eropa-18.2019.11.

Nkyabonaki, J. (2019). Effectiveness of the Public Service Code of Ethics in Controlling Corrupt Behaviour in The Public Service: Opinion from the Grassroots at Toangoma Ward-Temeke Municipal Council. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(8), 1195–1212. doi:10.1177/0021909619862835.

Agostino, D., Bracci, E., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Accounting and accountability for the digital transformation of public services. Financial Accountability and Management, 38(2), 145–151. doi:10.1111/faam.12314.

Agostino, D., Saliterer, I., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 152–176. doi:10.1111/faam.12301.

Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Nilon, C. H., Pouyat, R. V., Zipperer, W. C., & Costanza, R. (2001). Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32(1), 127–157. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012.

Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Nilon, C. H., Pouyat, R. V., Zipperer, W. C., & Costanza, R. (2001). Urban Ecological Systems: Linking Terrestrial Ecological, Physical, and Socioeconomic Components of Metropolitan Areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32(1), 127–157. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012.

Chapin, F. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kofinas, G. P., Folke, C., Abel, N., Clark, W. C., Olsson, P., Smith, D. M. S., Walker, B., Young, O. R., Berkes, F., Biggs, R., Grove, J. M., Naylor, R. L., Pinkerton, E., Steffen, W., & Swanson, F. J. (2010). Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25(4), 241–249. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.008.

Kang, Y. J., Lee, T., Lee, J., Shim, S., Jeong, H., Satyawan, D., Kim, M. Y., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Translational genomics for plant breeding with the genome sequence explosion. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 14(4), 1057–1069. doi:10.1111/pbi.12449.

McDougall, N., Wagner, B., & MacBryde, J. (2019). An empirical explanation of the natural-resource-based view of the firm. Production Planning & Control, 30(16), 1366–1382. doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1620361.

Rasethe, M. T., Potgieter, M., & Pfab, M. (2021). Local management strategies and attitudes towards selected threatened or protected plant species in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 22(9). doi:10.13057/biodiv/d220922.

Tang, J., & Zhao, X. (2022). Large variability in response to future climate and land-use changes among Chinese Theaceae species. Ecology and Evolution, 12(11), 9480. doi:10.1002/ece3.9480.

Pilatti, F. K., Aguiar, T., Simíµes, T., Benson, E. E., & Viana, A. M. (2010). In vitro and cryogenic preservation of plant biodiversity in Brazil. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 47(1), 82–98. doi:10.1007/s11627-010-9302-y.

Sokolov, A., Sokolova, G., Bairambekov, S., & Boeva, T. (2020). Change in species composition of vegetation on various-aged set-aside lands of the Volga Delta. E3S Web of Conferences, 164, 7015. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202016407015.

Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., MŠ‚odkowski, M., Zwoliński, Z., & Wójcicki, M. (2019). Evaluating the scalability of public participation in urban land use planning: A comparison of Geoweb methods with face-to-face meetings. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(3), 511–533. doi:10.1177/2399808317719709.

Saunders, W. S. A., & Becker, J. S. (2015). A discussion of resilience and sustainability: Land use planning recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence, New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, 73–81. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.013.

Wang, N., Zu, J., Li, M., Zhang, J., & Hao, J. (2020). Spatial Zoning of Cultivated Land in Shandong Province Based on the Trinity of Quantity, Quality and Ecology. Sustainability, 12(5), 1849. doi:10.3390/su12051849.

Miao, J., & Lu, Q. (2020). An empirical study on the potential of land resources utilization in urban agglomeration development zones based on combination analysis. Earth Sciences Research Journal, 24(4), 439–447. doi:10.15446/esrj.v24n4.92069.

Ullah, K. M., & Mansourian, A. (2016). Evaluation of Land Suitability for Urban Land-Use Planning: Case Study Dhaka City. Transactions in GIS, 20(1), 20–37. doi:10.1111/tgis.12137.

Xiao, P., Zhao, C., Zhou, Y., Feng, H., Li, X., & Jiang, J. (2021). Study on land consolidation zoning in Hubei province based on the coupling of neural network and cluster analysis. Land, 10(7), 756. doi:10.3390/land10070756.

Balas, M., Carrilho, J., & Lemmen, C. (2021). The fit for purpose land administration approach-connecting people, processes and technology in mozambique. Land, 10(8), 818. doi:10.3390/land10080818.

Kessler, A., van Reemst, L., Beun, M., Slingerland, E., Pol, L., & De Winne, R. (2021). Mobilizing farmers to stop land degradation: A different discourse from Burundi. Land Degradation & Development, 32(12), 3403–3414. doi:10.1002/ldr.3763.

Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). The interview. Research Methods in Education: Fourth Edition. Routledge, London, United States.

Phanthuwongpakdee, N., Intaprasert, P., Gongkaew, C., Bunnag, C., Wichachai, S., & Soontornthum, T. (2022). Localizing SDGs in Thailand: Towards a More Inclusive National Science, Research, and Innovation (SRI) Plan. Environmental Sciences Pro-Ceedings, 15(1), 15. doi:10.3390/environsciproc2022015015.

Vivek, R., Nanthagopan, Y., & Piriyatharshan, S. (2023). Beyond methods: Theoretical underpinnings of triangulation in qualitative and multi-method studies: A literature review. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 52(55), 13–22. doi:10.61727/sssppj/2.2023.13.

Degele, P. E. (2023). Protected areas in land use planning policies: Key articulation for territorial justice. Environmental Science & Policy, 140, 189–201. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.020.

Peskett, L., Metzger, M. J., & Blackstock, K. (2023). Regional scale integrated land use planning to meet multiple objectives: Good in theory but challenging in practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 147, 292–304. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.022.

Du, J., Zhu, X., Li, X., & íœnal, E. (2024). What drives the green development behavior of local governments? A perspective of grounded theory. Heliyon, 10(6). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27744.

Boontae, N., & Ussavadilokrit, M. (2024). Challenges in implementing building information modelling for facility management in government buildings in Thailand. Property Management, 42(3), 431–453. doi:10.1108/PM-02-2023-0017.

Jansen, L. J. M., & Kalas, P. P. (2023). Improving Governance of Tenure in Policy and Practice: Agrarian and Environmental Transition in the Mekong Region and Its Impacts on Sustainability Analyzed through the ‘Tenure-Scape' Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3), 1773. doi:10.3390/su15031773.

Fan, X., Wang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Rural Business Environments, Information Channels, and Farmers' Pesticide Utilization Behavior: A Grounded Theory Analysis in Hainan Province, China. Agriculture (Switzerland), 14(2), 196. doi:10.3390/agriculture14020196.

Senathirajah, A. R. S., Zulkifle, N. N., Sundram, V. P. K., Ibrahim, I., Nakamura, Y., & Johan, Z. J. (2024). Applying the Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) In the Vehicle Inventory Registration Process for Sustainable Transportation at Shasha Industries. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 2811-2820.

Thinphanga, P., & Friend, R. (2024). Thailand's policy vacuum: Land use planning as sites of negotiation and contestation. Land Use Policy, 137, 106994. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106994.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th Ed.). Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, United States.

Acceptance Rate:	21%
Review Speed:	74 days
Issue Per Year:	6
Number of Volumes:	7
Number of Issues:	44
Number of Articles:	493
Number of Reviewers:	1187
Number of Contributors:	1394
Contributing Countries:	83
No. of WoS Citations:	2609
No. of Scopus Citations:	2936
No. of Google Citations:	4161
Google h-index:	29
Google i10-index:	126
Abstract Views:	681,807
PDF Download:	492,524

Public Service Provisions for Land Resource Planning

Authors

Downloads

Downloads

Login

submission

Publisher & Affiliated Societies

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

IndexedBy

Indexing and Abstracting

twitter

Social Media

Analytics

Analytics

Information

Most Cited Articles

Optical and Structural Characterization of Bi2FexNbO7 Nanoparticles for Environmental Applications

Digital Transformation: Opportunities and Challenges for Leaders in the Emerging Countries in Response to Covid-19 Pandemic

Thermal Regeneration and Reuse of Carbon and Glass Fibers from Waste Composites

Impediments of Green Finance Adoption System: Linking Economy and Environment

Address

Contact Info:

Public Service Provisions for Land Resource Planning

Authors

Downloads

Downloads

Login

submission

Publisher & Affiliated Societies

Indexing & Abstracting

SidebarMenu

social

Journal Imprint

Journal Metrics

IndexedBy

Indexing and Abstracting

twitter

Social Media

Analytics

Analytics

Information

Most Cited Articles

Optical and Structural Characterization of Bi2FexNbO7 Nanoparticles for Environmental Applications

Digital Transformation: Opportunities and Challenges for Leaders in the Emerging Countries in Response to Covid-19 Pandemic

Thermal Regeneration and Reuse of Carbon and Glass Fibers from Waste Composites

Impediments of Green Finance Adoption System: Linking Economy and Environment