The Assessment of the Green Development of the Tobacco Industry Using a Multicriteria Method
Abstract
Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-01-018
Full Text: PDF
Keywords
References
Reitsma, M. B., Kendrick, P. J., Ababneh, E., Abbafati, C., Abbasi-Kangevari, M., Abdoli, A., Abedi, A., Abhilash, E. S., Abila, D. B., Aboyans, V., Abu-Rmeileh, N. M., Adebayo, O. M., Advani, S. M., Aghaali, M., Ahinkorah, B. O., Ahmad, S., Ahmadi, K., Ahmed, H., Aji, B., … Gakidou, E. (2021). Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 397(10292), 2337–2360. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01169-7.
W.H.O. (2024). Tobacco use declines despite tobacco industry efforts to jeopardize progress. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland. Available Online: https://www.who.int/news/item/16-01-2024-tobacco-use-declines-despite-tobacco-industry-efforts-to-jeopardize-progress (accessed on January 2025).
Zafeiridou, M., Hopkinson, N. S., & Voulvoulis, N. (2018). Cigarette Smoking: An Assessment of Tobacco’s Global Environmental Footprint Across Its Entire Supply Chain. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(15), 8087–8094. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01533.
Hendlin, Y. H., & Bialous, S. A. (2020). The environmental externalities of tobacco manufacturing: A review of tobacco industry reporting. Ambio, 49(1), 17–34. doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01148-3.
Shoukat, M. H., Selem, K. M., & Cao, D. (2024). How do corporate social responsibility initiatives enhance sustainability performance? Evidence from tobacco firms. Environment, Development and Sustainability. doi:10.1007/s10668-024-04477-w.
Nara, E. O. B., Gelain, C., Moraes, J. A. R., Benitez, L. B., Schaefer, J. L., & Baierle, I. C. (2019). Analysis of the sustainability reports from multinationals tobacco companies in southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1093–1102. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.399.
Cao, G., Bao, Y., Wu, C., & Wang, Y. (2017). Analysis on efficiency optimization of tobacco leaf flue-curing process. Procedia Engineering, 205, 540–547. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.413.
Zhang, Y., He, X., Liang, H., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, C., & Shi, X. (2016). Long-term tobacco plantation induces soil acidification and soil base cation loss. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(6), 5442–5450. doi:10.1007/s11356-015-5673-2.
Houghton, F., Houghton, S., O’ Doherty, D., McInerney, D., & Duncan, B. (2018). ‘Greenwashing’ tobacco products through ecological and social/equity labelling: A potential threat to tobacco control. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation, 4. doi:10.18332/tpc/99674.
Houghton, F., Houghton, S., O’Doherty, D., McInerney, D., & Duncan, B. (2019). Greenwashing tobacco—attempts to eco-label a killer product. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 9(1), 82–85. doi:10.1007/s13412-018-0528-z.
Momas, C. (2023). Tobacco greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation, 9(Supplement), A18. doi:10.18332/tpc/162455.
Nogués, S., González-González, E., & Cordera, R. (2019). Planning regional sustainability: An index-based framework to assess spatial plans. Application to the region of Cantabria (Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 510–523. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.328.
Wang, Q., Han, R., Huang, Q., Hao, J., Lv, N., Li, T., & Tang, B. (2018). Research on energy conservation and emissions reduction based on AHP-fuzzy synthetic evaluation model: A case study of tobacco enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 88–97. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.270.
Li, Z., Feng, Z., Zhang, Z., Sun, S., Chen, J., Gao, Y., Zhao, H., Lv, X., & Wu, Y. (2023). Analysis of energy consumption of tobacco drying process based on industrial big data. Drying Technology, 42(2), 307–317. doi:10.1080/07373937.2023.2288667.
Zare Derakhshan, J., Firouzi, S., & Kosari-Moghaddam, A. (2022). Energy audit of tobacco production agro-system based on different farm size levels in northern Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(2), 2715–2735. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01552-4.
Ben Jebli, M., & Boussaidi, R. (2024). Empirical evidence of emissions discourse related to food, beverage, and tobacco production in leading manufacturing nations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(16), 23968–23978. doi:10.1007/s11356-024-32690-7.
Kourgialas, N. N. (2021). A critical review of water resources in Greece: The key role of agricultural adaptation to climate-water effects. Science of The Total Environment, 775, 145857. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145857.
Falloon, P., & Betts, R. (2010). Climate impacts on European agriculture and water management in the context of adaptation and mitigation-The importance of an integrated approach. Science of the Total Environment, 408(23), 5667–5687. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.002.
Benavente, M. J., Caballero, M. J. A., Silvero, G., López-Coca, I., & Escobar, V. G. (2019). Cellulose Acetate Recovery from Cigarette Butts. Proceedings, 2(20), 1447. doi:10.3390/proceedings2201447.
Moroz, I., Scapolio, L. G. B., Cesarino, I., Leão, A. L., & Bonanomi, G. (2021). Toxicity of cigarette butts and possible recycling solutions—a literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(9), 10450–10473. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11856-z.
Hoek, J., Gendall, P., Blank, M. L., Robertson, L., & Marsh, L. (2020). Butting out: An analysis of support for measures to address tobacco product waste. Tobacco Control, 29(2), 131–137. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054956.
Ahmad, A., Ikram, A., Rehan, M. F., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Going green: Impact of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.973676.
Issa, A., Khadem, A., Alzubi, A., & Berberoğlu, A. (2024). The Path from Green Innovation to Supply Chain Resilience: Do Structural and Dynamic Supply Chain Complexity Matter? Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(9), 3762. doi:10.3390/su16093762.
W.H.O. (2022). Tobacco: Poisoning our Planet. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland. Available Online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240051287 (accessed on January 2025).
W.H.O. (2024). WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco use 2000–2025. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland. Available Online: http://apps.who.int/bookorders (accessed on January 2025).
Baker, R. R., Massey, E. D., & Smith, G. (2004). An overview of the effects of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry and toxicity. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42, 53–83. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.01.001.
Evans-Reeves, K., Lauber, K., & Hiscock, R. (2021). The ‘filter fraud’ persists: the tobacco industry is still using filters to suggest lower health risks while destroying the environment. Tobacco Control, 31(e1), e80–e82. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056245.
Torkashvand, J., Farzadkia, M., Sobhi, H. R., & Esrafili, A. (2020). Littered cigarette butt as a well-known hazardous waste: A comprehensive systematic review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 383, 121242. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121242.
Proctor, R. N. (2012). Golden holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition. University of California Press, Berkeley, United States. doi:10.1525/9780520950436.
Maulana, I. G., & Sunitiyoso, Y. (2024). Strategic Implementation of Big Data Automation for Wastage Management Reporting Using Analytical Hierarchy Process in The Tobacco Industry. Quantitative Economics and Management Studies, 5(3), 631–643. doi:10.35877/454ri.qems2623.
IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva, Switzerland. doi:10.1017/9781009157926.
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2020). Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020. Official Journal of the European Union, Brussels, Belgium. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R0852&from=EN (accessed on January 2025).
MSCI. (2022). ESG and Climate Trends to Watch for 2023. Morgan Stanley Capital International: MSCI, Paris, France. Available online: https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/35124068/ESG+and+Climate+Trends+to+Watch+for+2023.pdf (accessed on January 2025),
Abdallah, A. B., & Al-Ghwayeen, W. S. (2018). Green supply chain management and business performance. Business Process Management Journal, 26(2), 489–512. doi:10.1108/bpmj-03-2018-0091.
Eltayeb, T. K., Zailani, S., & Ramayah, T. (2011). Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(5), 495–506. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.003.
Longoni, A., Luzzini, D., & Guerci, M. (2018). Deploying Environmental Management across Functions: The Relationship Between Green Human Resource Management and Green Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1081–1095. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1.
Molina-Azorin, J. F., López-Gamero, M. D., Tarí, J. J., Pereira-Moliner, J., & Pertusa-Ortega, E. M. (2021). Environmental management, human resource management and green human resource management: A literature review. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 48. doi:10.3390/ADMSCI11020048.
Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paillé, P., & Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: scale development and validity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 31–55. doi:10.1111/1744-7941.12147.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning. Priority Setting. Resource Allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, United States.
Russo, R. D. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1123–1132. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081.
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Saaty, T. L. (2013). The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research, 61(5), 1101–1118. doi:10.1287/opre.2013.1197.
Goepel, K. D. (2013). Implementing the Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Standard Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Corporate Enterprises – a New AHP Excel Template with Multiple Inputs. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1–10. doi:10.13033/isahp.y2013.047.
Goepel, K. (2018). Implementation of an Online software tool for the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP-OS). International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 10(3), 469–487. doi:10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590.
Misran, M. F. R., Roslin, E. N., & Nur, N. M. (2020). AHP-consensus judgement on transitional decision-making: With a discussion on the relation towards open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 1–17. doi:10.3390/joitmc6030063.
Asadabadi, M. R., Chang, E., & Saberi, M. (2019). Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). Cogent Engineering, 6(1). doi:10.1080/23311916.2019.1623153.
DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2025-09-01-018
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.