1. Home
  2. Vol 8, No 4 (2024)
  3. Karunia

Digital Collaboration Models for Empowering SMEs: Enhancing Public Organization Performance

R. Luki Karunia, Edi Yanto, Johan Hendri Prasetyo, Erfi Muthmainah, Lely Hiswendari, Prima Setiawan, Muhammad Aulia Putra Saragih

Abstract


This study aims to examine the effectiveness of SiBakul Jogja, a digital platform initiated by the government in Yogyakarta Province, in supporting small businesses and fostering collaboration among various stakeholders. Through interviews and research analysis, we investigate the mechanisms through which SiBakul Jogja facilitates small business growth and innovation. The findings reveal that SiBakul Jogja serves as a comprehensive resource hub for small businesses, offering assistance in record-keeping, advisory services, and fostering partnerships for innovation. Collaboration among government entities, businesses, academics, and the media plays a crucial role in enhancing the platform's impact. Positive outcomes include job creation and improved access to financial resources. However, challenges such as digital skills shortages and internet connectivity issues persist. The novelty of this study lies in its examination of SiBakul Jogja's collaborative approach in alignment with principles of new public service, contributing to improved public service delivery and economic growth. Addressing these challenges collectively presents an opportunity to leverage SiBakul Jogja's potential to significantly boost the local economy. Through effective teamwork and organizational strategies, digital support for small businesses can be optimized, fostering economic growth and resilience.

 

Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-04-015

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Digitalization; Collaborative Model for MSMEs; Penta-Helix; Collaborative Governance.

References


Kementerian Perdagangan. (2023). Press Release from the Ministry of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia: Largest in Southeast Asia, the Potential of Indonesia's Digital Economy in 2025 Reaches USD 146 Billion. Kementerian Perdagangan. Available online: https://www.kemendag.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/terbesar-di-asia-tenggara-potensi-ekonomi-digital-indonesia-pada-2025-capai-usd-146-miliar (accessed on May 2024). (In Indonesian).

Damuri, Y., Hirawan, F., Fauri, A., & Titiheruw, I. (2021). Digital Economy Development Strategy in Indonesia: Multi-Sectoral Analysis and Socio-Economic Aspects. CSIS Report, Centre for strategic and international Studies, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Tamasek, (2019). e-Conomy SEA 2019. Tamasek, Singapore. Google, Tamasek, & Bain & Company. Available online: https://www.temasek.com.sg/content/dam/temasek-corporate/news-and-views/resources/reports/google-temasek-e-conomy-sea-2019.pdf (accessed on May 2024).

Das, K., Tamhane, T., Vatterott, B., Wibowo, P., & Wintels, S. (2018). The digital archipelago: How online commerce is driving Indonesia’s economic development. McKinsey & Company, New York, United States. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/asia-pacific/the-digital-archipelago-how-online-commerce-is-driving-indonesias-economic-development (accessed on May 2024).

Limanseto, H. (2021). MSMEs are an important pillar in the Indonesian economy. Available online: https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/2969/umkm-menjadi-pilar-penting-dalam-perekonomian-indonesia (accessed on May 2024).

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informasi. (2019). Development of the Digital Economy in Indonesia: Strategy and Potential Sectors. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informasi, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).

United Nations Development Programme. (2021). Supporting Indonesian MSMEs, UNDP, Indosat Ooderoo and the Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs, Launch Performance Survey During the Pandemic. United Nations Development Programme, New York, United States. Available online: https://www.undp.org/id/indonesia/press-releases/dukung-umkm-indonesia-undp-indosat-ooderoo-dan-kementerian-koperasi-ukm-luncurkan-survei-kinerja-masa-pandemi (accessed on July 2024). (In Indonesian).

Wuryasti, F. (2022). The MSME Sector is Increasingly Adaptive to the Pandemic. Media Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available online: https://mediaindonesia.com/ekonomi/465159/sektor-umkm-semakin-adaptif-hadapi-pandemi (accessed on May 2024).

Wicaksono, T. Y. (2022). Mandiri Institute: MSME Sector is More Adaptive to Facing the Pandemic. Bank Mandiri, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available online: https://bankmandiri.co.id/web/guest/news-detail?primaryKey=47753943&backUrl=/news (accessed on May 2024). (In Indonesian).

Katadata Insight Center. (2020). Digitalizing MSMEs in the Midst of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Katadata Insight Center, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available online: https://katadata.co.id/umkm (accessed on May 2024). (In Indonesian).

Hernández-Linares, R., Kellermanns, F. W., & López-Fernández, M. C. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and SME performance: The moderating effect of market orientation. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(1), 162–195. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12474.

Wellalage, N. H., & Fernandez, V. (2019). Innovation and SME finance: Evidence from developing countries. International Review of Financial Analysis, 66(March), 101370. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2019.06.009.

Nurprabowo, A., & Meilani, M. M. (2023). Green Energy Series Strategic Study: Formal Sector MSME Investment Strengthens the Pillars of National Economic Resilience. Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM. (2022). PATENT: #Digital Transformation Welcomes the Future (1st Ed.). Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).

Kominfo. (2023). Indonesia Will Become the Largest Digital Economy Player in Southeast Asia. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika, Jakarta, Indonesia. Available online: https://www.kominfo.go.id/index.php/content/detail/6441/Indonesia+ Akan+Jadi+Pemain+Ekonomi+Digital+Terbesar+di+Asia+Tenggara/0/berita_satker (accessed on June 2024). (In Indonesian).

Saleh, C. (2020). Concept, understanding and goals of collaboration. Pustaka Universitas Terbuka, 1. (In Indonesian).

Faidati, N., Khozin, M., & Katon Mahendra, G. (2020). SiBakul Jogja Free Shipping: Empowerment to Turn on the Economy of Yogyakarta’s MSMEs in Pandemic Era. IAPA Proceedings Conference, 385. doi:10.30589/proceedings.2020.417.

Putri Vidiastuti, D., Darwin, M., & Ikhwan, H. (2023). Difusi dan Adopsi Inovasi SiBakul Markethub Free Ongkir DIY di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Matra Pembaruan, 7(1), 49–60. doi:10.21787/mp.7.1.2023.49-60.

Ivan, I. (2021). SiBakul Jogja Transforms into Markethub. KrJogja, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Available online: https://www.krjogja.com/yogyakarta/1242484937/sibakul-jogja-bertransformasi-menjadi-markethub (accessed on May 2024).

Azka, A., Katili, P., Kirana, P. C., & Nufus, H. T. (2019). Application of New Public Service Dimensions in Innovation and Community Empowerment in SiBakul Jogja. Ummat Scientific Journals, 1(1), 1–26. (In Indonesian).

Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Inside the matrix: Integrating the paradigms of intergovernmental and network management. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(12), 1401–1422. doi:10.1081/PAD-120024403.

Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press, Washington, United States.

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.

Mungkasa, O. M. (2020). Collaborative Governance in Public Policy Design Case Study of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Implementation in Indonesia. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).

Imperial, M. T. (2004). Collaboration and performance management in network settings. IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, United States.

Amirkhanyan, A. A. (2009). Collaborative performance measurement: Examining and explaining the prevalence of collaboration in state and local government contracts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 523–554. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun022.

Febrian, R. A. (2018). Collaborative Governance in Implementing a Regional Innovation System in Pelalawan Regency, Riau Province (Case Study of Innovation in Development of Palm Cattle Integrity for Livestock Farming Communities). Universitas Padjajaran Bandung, Bandung City, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).

Ibrahim, H. R. (2022). Empowering Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Through Social Innovation and Collaborative Governance Approaches. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Budaya, 43(1), 103. doi:10.47313/jib.v43i1.1532. (In Indonesian).

Talke, K., & Heidenreich, S. (2014). How to overcome pro‐change bias: incorporating passive and active innovation resistance in innovation decision models. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 894-907. doi:10.1111/jpim.12130.

Najmudin, M. F., Suryadi, A., & Saepudin, A. (2023). Implementation of the pentahelix collaboration model in the development of human resources for MSMEs. Abdimas Siliwangi, 6(3), 587–600. doi:10.22460/as.v6i3.17681. (In Indonesian).

Mulyono, F. (2008). Innovation in the public sector. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(2), 11. (In Indonesian).

Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). Linking Innovation to the Public Sector: Contexts, Concepts and Challenges. Innovation in the Public Sector. IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management, Palgrave Macmillan, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.1057/9780230307520_1.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (7th Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, United States.

Rachman, A., Yochanan, E., Samanlangi, A. I., and Purnomo, H. (2019). Qualitative Quantitative Research Methods and R&D. Saba Jaya Publisher, Karawang, Indonesia.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Research Design. SAGE Publication, Thousand Oaks, United States.

Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw Hill, Boston, United States.

Midgley, G., Cavana, R. Y., Brocklesby, J., Foote, J. L., Wood, D. R. R., & Ahuriri-Driscoll, A. (2013). Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 143–154. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.047.

Rosady, R. (2014). Public Relations Management and Communication Media Concept and Application. Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, Indonesia. (In Indonesian).

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

Gerring, J. (2017). Qualitative Methods. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 15–36. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-092415-024158.

Bergman, M. M., & Coxon, A. P. (2005). The Quality in Qualitative Methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), 34. doi:10.17169/fqs-6.2.457.

Keller, A. C., Samuel, R., Bergman, M. M., & Semmer, N. K. (2014). Psychological, Educational, and Sociological Perspectives on Success and Well-Being in Career Development, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8911-0.

Chairul Basrun Umanailo, M. (2019). Discourse on the Consumerist Community Consumption. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(54), 1181–1186. doi:10.32861/jssr.54.1181.1186.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-04-015

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 R. Luki Karunia, Edi Yanto, Johan Hendri Prasetyo, Erfi Muthmainah, Lely Hiswendari, Prima Setiawan, Muhammad Aulia Putra Saragih