1. Home
  2. Vol 8, No 3 (2024)
  3. Sabino

Measuring Sustainability: A Validation Study of a Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Scale in Portugal

Ana Sabino, Ana Moreira, Francisco Cesário, Mafalda Pinto Coelho

Abstract


Studies on sustainability using the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) approach are increasing. However, there is no consensus on how to measure the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainability based on TBL theory. Despite numerous proposals, there is a lack of integrated measures covering all three dimensions simultaneously and having a human-centered approach. This gap is particularly pronounced in Portugal, where no existing scale adequately meets the needs of academics and practitioners. To address this challenge, and based on existing measures that encompass the nature of each TBL dimension, we present and validate a 15-item TBL scale, with 5 items per dimension: economic, social, and environmental. To test convergent validity and contribute to the discussion regarding the links between TBL and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), we also analyzed the association between each TBL dimension and each CSR dimension. Using a sample of 635 participants, divided into two independent sub-samples, we conducted comprehensive statistical analyses, including exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability testing, and convergent and discriminant analysis, followed by invariance testing of the TBL scale. The results suggest that the proposed measure fits the Portuguese sample, and all psychometric results are robust. We also establish the links between the three dimensions of TBL—economic, social, and environmental—and the CSR dimensions, as convergent validity is verified between social TBL and employees' CSR practices. We discuss theoretical and practical implications, as well as limitations and suggestions for future research.

 

Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-03-06

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Sustainability; CSR; TBL; Corporate Social Responsibility; Sustainable Development; Scale Development; Survey-based Research.

References


Sitko, R. (2023). Sustainable Human Resource Management: Using HRM to achieve long-term social, environmental and business goals. Kogan Page, London, United Kingdom.

WCED. (1987). Our Common Future: the Brundtland Report. World Commission on Environment and Development, New York, United States.

Høgevold, N. M., Svensson, G., Rodriguez, R., & Eriksson, D. (2019). Relative importance and priority of TBL elements on the corporate performance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(3), 609–623. doi:10.1108/MEQ-04-2018-0069.

Shayan, N. F., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Sustainability, 14(3), 1222. doi:10.3390/su14031222.

Jerónimo Silvestre, W., Antunes, P., & Leal Filho, W. (2018). The corporate sustainability typology: Analysing sustainability drivers and fostering sustainability at enterprises. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 513–533. doi:10.3846/20294913.2016.1213199.

Henriquez, R., Muñoz-Villamizar, A., & Santos, J. (2023). Operational excellence through triple bottom line in emerging countries: a systematic review and conceptual model proposal in production research. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14(4), 710–729. doi:10.1108/IJLSS-04-2022-0079.

Yip, W. S., Zhou, H. T., & To, S. (2023). A critical analysis on the triple bottom line of sustainable manufacturing: key findings and implications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(14), 41388–41404. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-25122-x.

Trigo, A., Marta-Costa, A., & Fragoso, R. (2023). Improving sustainability assessment: A context-oriented classification analysis for the wine industry. Land Use Policy, 126, 106551. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106551.

De Giovanni, P. (2012). Do internal and external environmental management contribute to the triple bottom line? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(3), 265–290. doi:10.1108/01443571211212574.

Paulraj, A., Chen, I. J., & Blome, C. (2017). Motives and Performance Outcomes of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices: A Multi-theoretical Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 239–258. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0.

Kurniawati, D. I., Zuhroh, D., Setiyorini, W., & Mennita, R. (2022). The Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Approach on Firm Performance Level Assessment. Proceedings of International Conference of Graduate School on Sustainability 4-5 November, 2022, Malang, Indonesia.

Paauwe, J. (2004). HRM and performance: Achieving long-term viability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Sachs, J.D., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G. & Drumm, E. (2023). Sustainable Development Report 2023, Implementing the SDG Stimulus. Dublin University Press, Dublin, Ireland.

Gomes, A., Florido, A., Borges, A., & Conde, F. (2022). The importance of the role of SMEs, in Portugal, in achieving sustainable development. Proceedings of the IX Jornada Internacional AECA sobre Valoración, Financiación y Gestión de Riesgos, 31 March- 1 April, 2022, Cuenca, Spain. (In Portuguese).

Scuri, S., Ferreira, M., Jardim Nunes, N., Nisi, V., & Mulligan, C. (2022). Hiting the Triple Botom Line: Widening the HCI Approach to Sustainability. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 29 April - 5 May, 2022, New Orleans, United States. doi:10.1145/3491102.3517518.

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.

Arowoshegbe, A. O., Emmanuel, U., & Gina, A. (2016). Sustainability and triple bottom line: An overview of two interrelated concepts. Igbinedion University Journal of Accounting, 2(16), 88-126.

Fauzi, H., Svensson, G., & Rahman, A. A. (2010). “Triple bottom line” as “sustainable corporate performance”: A proposition for the future. Sustainability, 2(5), 1345–1360. doi:10.3390/su2051345.

Farooq, Q., Fu, P., Liu, X., & Hao, Y. (2021). Basics of macro to microlevel corporate social responsibility and advancement in triple bottom line theory. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(3), 969–979. doi:10.1002/csr.2069.

Hammer, J., & Pivo, G. (2016). The Triple Bottom Line and Sustainable Economic Development Theory and Practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(1), 25–36. doi:10.1177/0891242416674808.

Nogueira, E., Gomes, S., & Lopes, J. M. (2023). Triple Bottom Line, Sustainability, and Economic Development: What Binds Them Together? A Bibliometric Approach. Sustainability, 15(8), 6706. doi:10.3390/su15086706.

Gallagher, V. C., Hrivnak, M. W., Valcea, S., Mahoney, C. B., & LaWong, D. (2018). A comprehensive three-dimensional sustainability measure: The ‘missing P’ of ‘people’ – a vital stakeholder in sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 772–787. doi:10.1002/csr.1493.

Armstrong, M. & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (15th Ed.), Kogan Page, London, United Kingdom.

Reimann, B. C. (1975). Organizational Effectiveness and Management’s Public Values: A Canonical Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 18(2), 224–241. doi:10.5465/255526.

Wartick, S. L. (1988). How Issues Management Contribute to Corporate Performance. Business Forum, 13(2), 16.

Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 949–969. doi:10.2307/256718.

Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. (1999). Choice Reviews Online, 36(07), 36-3997-36–3997. doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997.

Van Laar, D., Edwards, J. A., & Easton, S. (2007). The Work-Related Quality of Life scale for healthcare workers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 325–333. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04409.x.

Easton, S.; Van Laar, D. (2018). User Manual for the Work-Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) Scale: A Measure of Quality of Working Life (2nd Ed.), University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

Gomes, J. F. S., Sabino, A., & Antunes, V. (2023). The Effect of Green Human Resources Management Practices on Employees’ Affective Commitment and Work Engagement: The Moderating Role of Employees’ Biospheric Value. Sustainability, 15(3), 2190. doi:10.3390/su15032190.

Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2012). Environmental Sustainability at Work: A Call to Action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 444–466. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01478.x.

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176.

Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & Williams, E. G. (2013). Read This Article, but Don’t Print It: Organizational Citizenship Behavior Toward the Environment. Group and Organization Management, 38(2), 163–197. doi:10.1177/1059601112475210.

Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality & Individual Differences, 37(8), 1597–1613. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015.

Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Hafeez, S., Khan, I., Tahir, M., & Afridi, M. A. (2018). Promoting employee’s pro-environmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 424–438. Portico. doi:10.1002/csr.1694.

Kaiser, F. G., Oerke, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2007). Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 242–251. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004.

Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176–194. doi:10.1002/job.1820.

Kim, S. H., Kim, M., Han, H. S., & Holland, S. (2016). The determinants of hospitality employees’ pro-environmental behaviors: The moderating role of generational differences. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 52, 56–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.09.013.

Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87–96. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002.

Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(1), 1–8. doi:10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6.

CIPD (2024). CIPD Good Work Index. The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, London, United Kingdom. Available online: www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/work/trends/goodwork (accessed on June 2024).

Jone, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Heller, K. W. (2016). Illuminating the signals job seekers receive from an employer’s community involvement and environmental sustainability practices: Insights into why most job seekers are attracted, others are indifferent, and a few are repelled. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 183285. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00426.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411–427. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6.

Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. Wiley, Hoboken, United States.

Cramer, D. (2003). Fundamental statistics for social research: step-by-step calculations and computer techniques using SPSS for Windows. Routledge, London, United Kingdom.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

Isil, O., & Hernke, M. T. (2017). The Triple Bottom Line: A Critical Review from a Transdisciplinary Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1235–1251. doi:10.1002/bse.1982.

Mendes, T., Braga, V., Correia, A., & Silva, C. (2021). Linking corporate social responsibility, cooperation and innovation: the triple bottom line perspective. Innovation & Management Review, 20(3), 244–280. doi:10.1108/inmr-03-2021-0039.

Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Nonnormal and Categorical Data in Structural Equation Models. A Second Course in Structural Equation Modeling, Information Age, Greenwich, United Kingdom.

Pestana, M. H., & Gageiro, J. N. (2008). Data Analysis for Social Sciences: The Complementarity of SPSS (5th revised and corrected edition), Edicoes Sílabo, Lisbon, Portugal. (In Portuguese).

Marôco, J. (2018). Statistical analysis with SPSS Statistics. Sintra: Report, 1-277.

Ortiz-Martínez, E., Marín-Hernández, S., & Santos-Jaén, J. M. (2023). Sustainability, corporate social responsibility, non-financial reporting and company performance: Relationships and mediating effects in Spanish small and medium sized enterprises. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 349–364. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.015.

Cruz, C. O., Gaspar, P., & de Brito, J. (2019). On the concept of sustainable sustainability: An application to the Portuguese construction sector. Journal of Building Engineering, 25, 100836. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100836.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2024-08-03-06

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Ana Sabino, Ana Moreira, Francisco Cesário, Mafalda Pinto-Coelho