E-Learning Adoption: Designing a Network-Based Educational and Methodological Course on "Humans and Their Health"
Abstract
Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-06-014
Full Text: PDF
Keywords
References
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001.
Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Pereira, V., Islam, N., Giudice, M. D., & Choudrie, J. (2022). Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121445. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121445.
Zhang, Z., Cao, T., Shu, J., & Liu, H. (2022). Identifying key factors affecting college students’ adoption of the e-learning system in mandatory blended learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1388–1401. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1723113.
Fauzi, M. A. (2022). E-learning in higher education institutions during COVID-19 pandemic: current and future trends through bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 8(5), 9433. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09433.
Rahayu, N. W., Ferdiana, R., & Kusumawardani, S. S. (2022). A systematic review of ontology use in E-Learning recommender system. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100047. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100047.
Mastan, I. A., Sensuse, D. I., Suryono, R. R., & Kautsarina, K. (2022). Evaluation of Distance Learning System (E-Learning): A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Teknoinfo, 16(1), 132. doi:10.33365/jti.v16i1.1736.
Rachman, T. T., Komariah, A., Kurniady, D. A., & Rahmawati, I. (2022). Learning Effectiveness Through Utilization Of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)-Based Google Classroom. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 3964–3975.
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers and Education, 49(4), 1066–1080. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001.
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. doi:10.2307/30036540.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007.
Kanwar, A., & Mishra, S. (2018). Can technology solve the problems of higher education? Horizons, 23, 20–21.
Sangrà, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 145. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161.
Nurbekova, Z. K., Mukhamediyeva, K. M., Davletova, A. H., & Kasymova, A. H. (2018). Methodological system of educational robotics training: Systematic literature review. Espacios, 39(15), 28–36.
Abdigapbarova, U., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2023). Organization of student-centered learning within the professional training of a future teacher in a digital environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 647-661. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11159-5.
Davletova, A. H., Tolganbaiuly, T., Tazhigulova, A. I., Smagulova, L. A., Kasymova, A. H., & Baigozhanova, D. S. (2019). Project-oriented training experience in micro-robot programming in college and its features. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, (22), 292-307.
Camara, J. S. (2020). Philippine Biology Education for a Curricular Innovation towards Industrial Revolution 4.0: A Mixed Method. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 41-51.
Choe, R. C., Scuric, Z., Eshkol, E., Cruser, S., Arndt, A., Cox, R., Toma, S. P., Shapiro, C., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Barnes, G., & Crosbie, R. H. (2019). Student Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Asynchronous Online Lecture Videos. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar55. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-08-0171.
Sadikin, A., & Hamidah, A. (2020). Online Learning in the Midst of the Covid-19 Outbreak. BIODIK, 6(2), 214–224. doi:10.22437/bio.v6i2.9759.
Maldarelli, G. A., Hartmann, E. M., Cummings, P. J., Horner, R. D., Obom, K. M., Shingles, R., & Pearlman, R. S. (2009). Virtual Lab Demonstrations Improve Students’ Mastery of Basic Biology Laboratory Techniques. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10(1), 51–57. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v10.99.
Schönborn, K. J., & Anderson, T. R. (2006). The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(2), 94–102. doi:10.1002/bmb.2006.49403402094.
Stuckey-Mickell, T. A., & Stuckey-Danner, B. D. (2007). Virtual labs in the online biology course: Student perceptions of effectiveness and usability. MERLOT journal of online learning and teaching, 3(2), 105-111.
Wei, C. A., & Woodin, T. (2011). Undergraduate research experiences in biology: Alternatives to the apprenticeship model. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 123–131. doi:10.1187/cbe.11-03-0028.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. doi:10.2307/249008.
Guri-Rosenblit, S., & Gros, B. (2011). E-learning: Confusing terminology, research gaps and inherent challenges. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/Revue internationale du e-learning et la formation à distance, 25(1), 729.
Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers and Education, 57(3), 1893–1906. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.003.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002.
Abu-Rish, E., Kim, S., Choe, L., Varpio, L., Malik, E., White, A. A., Craddick, K., Blondon, K., Robins, L., Nagasawa, P., Thigpen, A., Chen, L. L., Rich, J., & Zierler, B. (2012). Current trends in interprofessional education of health sciences students: A literature review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(6), 444–451. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.715604.
Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x.
Koh, J. H. L., & Divaharan, H. (2011). Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Integration Expertise Through the Tpack-Developing Instructional Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 35–58. doi:10.2190/ec.44.1.c.
Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2012). Numbers are not enough. Why e-learning analytics failed to inform an institutional strategic plan. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 149-163.
Ossiannilsson, E., & Landgren, L. (2012). Quality in e-learning - a conceptual framework based on experiences from three international benchmarking projects. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 42–51. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00439.x.
Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 111–131. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70.
Graf, S., Liu, T. C., & Kinshuk. (2010). Analysis of learners’ navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116–131. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00336.x.
Yuen, S. C.-Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented Reality: An Overview and Five Directions for AR in Education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 4(1), 11. doi:10.18785/jetde.0401.10.
Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the Concerns Based Adoption Model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331–367. doi:10.1080/03626784.1997.11075495.
Yan, T., & Deng, M. (2019). Regular education teachers’ concerns on inclusive education in China from the perspective of concerns-based adoption model. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(4), 384–404. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1435741.
Trapani, B., & Annunziato, A. (2018). Using the Concerns Based Adoption Model (CBAM) to Accelerate Understanding by Design Implementation. Journal of instructional pedagogies, 21.
Gabby, S., Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2017). The case of middle and high school chemistry teachers implementing technology: using the concerns-based adoption model to assess change processes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(1), 214–232. doi:10.1039/c6rp00193a.
Tobola, M. B. (2015). Utilizing the concerns-based adoption model in a professional development series for teachers implementing new technologies. PhD Thesis, North Dakota State University, Frago, United States.
Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. doi:10.3102/0034654308325896.
Stewart, G. (2015). Teachers' concerns and uses of iPads in the classroom with the concerns-based adoption model. PhD thesis, University of North Texas, Denton, United States.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.
Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 57(3), 1953–1960. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010.
Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.
Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1). doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4.
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related lnstructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211–229. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers and Education, 49(3), 740–762. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012.
Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300. doi:10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573.
Harris, J., Hofer, M., Blanchard, M., Grandgenett, N., Schmidt, D., Van Olphen, M., & Young, C. (2010). “Grounded” technology integration: Instructional planning using curriculum-based activity type taxonomies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(4), 573-605.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Boston, United States.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 50. doi:10.17705/1cais.01250.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.
Chatterjee, S., Chakraborty, S., Sarker, S., Sarker, S., & Lau, F. Y. (2009). Examining the success factors for mobile work in healthcare: A deductive study. Decision Support Systems, 46(3), 620–633. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.003.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and tam in online shopping: AN integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. doi:10.2307/30036519.
Hennington, A., & Janz, B. D. (2007). Information Systems and Healthcare XVI: Physician Adoption of Electronic Medical Records: Applying the UTAUT Model in a Healthcare Context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 5. doi:10.17705/1cais.01905.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254. doi:10.17705/1jais.00122.
Cao, X., Masood, A., Luqman, A., & Ali, A. (2018). Excessive use of mobile social networking sites and poor academic performance: Antecedents and consequences from stressor-strain-outcome perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.023.
Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217–230. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: the role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963.
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.
Dimitrova, M., Sadler, C., Hatzipanagos, S., & Murphy, A. (2003). Addressing learner diversity by promoting flexibility in e-learning environments. 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2003, Prague, Czech Republic. doi:10.1109/dexa.2003.1232037.
Alrawi, K., & Jaber, K. H. (2008). How flexible is e-learning in the educational institutions: the Arab universities’ case study. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 1(2), 118. doi:10.1504/ijtgm.2008.018442.
Ehlers, U.-D. (2018). Quality in e-Learning from a Learner’s Perspective. Distances et Médiations des Savoirs, Oldenburg, Germany. doi:10.4000/dms.2707.
Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–26. doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3.
Mccutcheon, K., Lohan, M., Traynor, M., & Martin, D. (2015). A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(2), 255–270. doi:10.1111/jan.12509.
Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923–6947. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1.
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. doi:10.1177/1094670514539730.
Huang, H. M., & Liaw, S. S. (2018). An analysis of learners’ intentions toward virtual reality learning based on constructivist and technology acceptance approaches. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(1), 91–115. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2503.
Kuo, Y. K., Kuo, T. H., Wang, J. H., & Ho, L. A. (2022). The Antecedents of University Students’ E-Learning Outcome under the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multiple Mediation Structural Path Comparison. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(24), 16794. doi:10.3390/su142416794.
Rovai, A., Ponton, M., Wighting, M., & Baker, J. (2007, July). A comparative analysis of student motivation in traditional classroom and e-learning courses. International Journal on E-learning, 6(3), 413-432.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003.
Soekamto, H., Nikolaeva, I., Abbood, A. A. A., Grachev, D., Kosov, M., Yumashev, A., Kostyrin, E., Lazareva, N., Kvitkovskaja, A., & Nikitina, N. (2022). Professional Development of Rural Teachers Based on Digital Literacy. Emerging Science Journal, 6(6), 1525–1540. doi:10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-06-019.
Mukataeva, Z., Dinmukhamedova, A., Kabieva, S., Baidalinova, B., Khamzina, S., Zekenova, L., & Aizman, R. (2022). Comparative characteristics of developing morphofunctional features of schoolchildren from different climatic and geographical regions. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 36(2), 158–166. doi:10.1515/jpem-2022-0474.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. doi:10.3102/00346543074003379.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Policy and Program Studies Service, Office of Planning, Evaluating, and policy Development, U. S. Department of education, Washington, United States.
DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-06-014
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.