1. Home
  2. Vol 7, No 2 (2023)
  3. Lapinskienė

How Does Environmental Data from ESG Concept Affect Stock Returns: Case of the European Union and US Capital Markets

Giedrė Lapinskienė, Dainora Gedvilaitė, Aušra Liučvaitienė, Kęstutis Peleckis

Abstract


This article examines the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance of firms, with a focus on the environmental pillar of the ESG concept. It is believed that the price of equities as well as sector-specific characteristics may be affected by ESG data. It also contributes to the argument that environmental performance and governance quality are related. The purpose of this paper is to statistically validate the separated environmental data from the ESG concept and investigate its impact on the equity price in the EU and the United States. Using simple linear regressions and a fixed effect panel data model, the association between environmental score and governance score, as well as equity price and environmental score, was estimated. This study examines the 500 largest US corporations comprising the S&P 500 index (S&P) and the 600 largest EU companies comprising the STOXX Europe 600 index (STOXX) (SXXP). This article analyzes ESG statistics for the period 2015–2020. The results indicate that a higher government score has a favorable effect on environmental pledges and that changes in stock price depend in part on environmental data. The novel contribution of this paper is that the results suggest a sector-specific contribution to the model, and it would be fascinating to analyze sector disparities and their ESG-related policies in greater detail.

 

Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-02-08

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


ESG; Equity Price; Environmental; Governance.

References


Holger, D., & Sardon, M. (2021). G-7 Calls for Making Climate-Change Reporting Compulsory. WSJ Pro Sustainable Business. Available online: https://www.wsj.com/articles/g-7-calls-for-making-climate-change-reporting-compulsory-11623080613 (accessed on January 2023).

World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2022). How business can lead the transformations the world need, WBCSD, Geneva, Switzerland. Available online: https://accionempresas.cl/content/uploads/wbcsd-vision-2050-time-to-transform.pdf (accessed on January 2023).

Matos, P. (2020). ESG and Responsible Institutional Investing Around the World: A Critical Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3668998.

Baldini, M., Maso, L. D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 79–98. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3139-1.

Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Strand, R. (2020). Sustainable open innovation to address a grand challenge : Lessons from Carlsberg and the Green Fiber Bottle. British Food Journal, 122(5), 1505–1517. doi:10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0534.

Lee, M. T., Raschke, R. L., & Krishen, A. S. (2022). Signaling green! Firm ESG signals in an interconnected environment that promote brand valuation. Journal of Business Research, 138, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.061.

Rossi, F., & Harjoto, M. A. (2020). Corporate non-financial disclosure, firm value, risk, and agency costs: evidence from Italian listed companies. Review of Managerial Science, 14(5), 1149–1181. doi:10.1007/s11846-019-00358-z.

Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Valente Gonçalves, L. M. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574. doi:10.3390/su10030574.

Yoo, S., & Managi, S. (2022). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102108. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2021.102108.

Mohammad, W.M.W., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2. doi:10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015.

Feng, J., Goodell, J. W., & Shen, D. (2022). ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 46, 1544–6123. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2021.102476.

Sha, Y., Zhang, P., Wang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2022). Capital market opening and green innovation-Evidence from Shanghai-Hong Kong stock connect and the Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connect. Energy Economics, 111. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106048.

Zhou, Q., Sun, S., & Liu, Q. (2019). The capital flow of stock market studies based on epidemic model with double delays. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 526. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.098.

Leung, W. S., Mazouz, K., Chen, J., & Wood, G. (2018). Organization capital, labor market flexibility, and stock returns around the world. Journal of Banking and Finance, 89, 150–168. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.02.008.

Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008.

Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict between Shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z.

Nelling, E., & Webb, E. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the “virtuous circle” revisited. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32(2), 197–209. doi:10.1007/s11156-008-0090-y.

Saygili, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 525–533. doi:10.1016/j.bir.2021.07.001.

Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1409–1428. doi:10.1108/cg-06-2020-0258.

Shanaev, S., & Ghimire, B. (2022). When ESG meets AAA: The effect of ESG rating changes on stock returns. Finance Research Letters, 46. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2021.102302.

Lööf, H., Sahamkhadam, M., & Stephan, A. (2022). Is Corporate Social Responsibility investing a free lunch? The relationship between ESG, tail risk, and upside potential of stocks before and during the COVID-19 crisis. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102499. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2021.102499.

Lapinskienė, G. (2011). Sustainable enterprises: Responses of market values. Business Systems & Economics, 1(1), 71-83.

Hoang, V.T.H., Przychodzen, W., Przychodzen, J., & Segbotangni, E. A. (2021). Environmental transparency and performance: Does the corporate governance matter? Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 10, 100123. doi:10.1016/j.indic.2021.100123.

Jacoby, G., Liu, M., Wang, Y., Wu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Corporate governance, external control, and environmental information transparency: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 58, 269–283. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2018.11.015.

Veenstra, E. M., & Ellemers, N. (2020). Esg indicators as organizational performance goals: Do rating agencies encourage a holistic approach? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(24), 1–15. doi:10.3390/su122410228.

Callan, S. J., & Thomas, J. M. (2009). Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: An update and reinvestigation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), 61–78. doi:10.1002/csr.182.

Kuo, T. C., Chen, H. M., & Meng, H. M. (2021). Do corporate social responsibility practices improve financial performance? A case study of airline companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 310, 127380. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127380.

Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001.

Meng-tao, C., Da-peng, Y., Wei-qi, Z., & Qi-jun, W. (2023). How does ESG disclosure improve stock liquidity for enterprises - Empirical evidence from China? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 98. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106926.

Chen, Y., Li, T., Zeng, Q., & Zhu, B. (2023). Effect of ESG performance on the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 83, 348–364. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2022.09.001.

Singh, A. (2021). Investigating the dynamic relationship between litigation funding, gold, bitcoin and the stock market: The case of Australia. Economic Modelling, 97, 45–57. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2021.01.007.

Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61–79. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y.

Omri, A., Euchi, J., Hasaballah, A. H., & Al-Tit, A. (2019). Determinants of environmental sustainability: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 1592-1601. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.111.

Wang, S., Wang, H., Wang, J., & Yang, F. (2020). Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? An examination of the underlying mechanism. Science of the Total Environment, 714, 136855. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136855.

Aharon, D. Y., & Siev, S. (2021). COVID-19, government interventions and emerging capital markets performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 58. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101492.

Didier, T., Levine, R., Llovet Montanes, R., & Schmukler, S. L. (2021). Capital market financing and firm growth. Journal of International Money and Finance, 118. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102459.

Do, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). Do higher-rated or enhancing ESG of firms enhance their long–term sustainability? Evidence from market returns in Korea. Sustainability, 12(7), 2664. doi:10.3390/su12072664.

Bae, K. H., Bailey, W., & Kang, J. (2021). Why is stock market concentration bad for the economy? Journal of Financial Economics, 140(2), 436–459. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.002.

López, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285–300. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9253-8.

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550.

Europe Commission. (2021). EU taxonomy for sustainable activities. Europe Commission, Brussels, Belgium. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/sustainable-finance/eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en (accessed on January 2023).

Wijayana, S., & Gray, S. J. (2018). Capital market consequences of cultural influences on earnings: The case of cross-listed firms in the U.S. stock market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 57, 134–147. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2018.03.007.

Wang, X., Yan, J. (Karena), Yan, C., & Gozgor, G. (2021). Emerging stock market exuberance and international short-term flows. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 75. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101417.

Ziegler, A., & Schröder, M. (2010). What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index?. A panel data analysis for european firms. Ecological Economics, 69(4), 848–856. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.10.009.

Ziegler, A., Busch, T., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2011). Disclosed corporate responses to climate change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis. Energy Economics, 33(6), 1283–1294. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.007.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-02-08

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.