Are Shocks to Petroleum Products Consumption Permanent or Temporary: A New Evidence from LM Unit Root Tests with Structural Breaks

Sameh A. Ajlouni, Abdallah M. Ghazo, Ziad M. Abu-Lila

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to examine whether shocks to the consumption of petroleum products in Jordan have permanent or temporary effects. This has been accomplished by applying Lee and Strazicich (2003) test of unit root with structural breaks to investigate the stationarity properties related to the time series of petroleum products consumption over the period 1961 to 2019. Empirical findings lend evidence that the consumption of petroleum products is a unit root process, implying that shocks to petroleum products consumption has permanent impact, and this consumption does not turn back to its time trend path following a shock. This indicates that there are high possibilities of energy demand management and conservation policies targeted towards achieving the intended goals in the long-run. In fact, this is compatible with the government energy strategies aimed at reducing the consumption of fossil oils.

 

Doi: 10.28991/esj-2021-01279

Full Text: PDF


Keywords


Petroleum Products; Jordan; Unit Root; Stationarity; Structural Breaks.

References


Apergis, Nicholas, and James E. Payne. “Structural Breaks and Petroleum Consumption in US States: Are Shocks Transitory or Permanent?” Energy Policy 38, no. 10 (October 2010): 6375–6378. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.015.

Solarin, Sakiru Adebola, and Hooi Hooi Lean. “Are Fluctuations in Oil Consumption Permanent or Transitory? Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests.” Energy Policy 88 (January 2016): 262–270. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.034.

Ozcan, Burcu. “Are Shocks to Energy Consumption Permanent or Temporary? The Case of 17 Middle East Countries.” Energy Exploration & Exploitation 31, no. 4 (August 2013): 589–605. doi:10.1260/0144-5987.31.4.589.

Ibrahim, Mustapha D., and Andrew Adewale Alola. “Integrated Analysis of Energy-Economic Development-Environmental Sustainability Nexus: Case Study of MENA Countries.” Science of the Total Environment 737 (October 2020): 139768. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139768.

Smyth, Russell, and Paresh Kumar Narayan. “Applied Econometrics and Implications for Energy Economics Research.” Energy Economics 50 (July 2015): 351–358. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.023.

Smyth, Russell. “Are Fluctuations in Energy Variables Permanent or Transitory? A Survey of the Literature on the Integration Properties of Energy Consumption and Production.” Applied Energy 104 (April 2013): 371–378. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.069.

Lean, Hooi Hooi, and Russell Smyth. “Are Shocks to Disaggregated Energy Consumption in Malaysia Permanent or Temporary? Evidence from LM Unit Root Tests with Structural Breaks.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 31 (March 2014): 319–328. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.040.

Ozturk, Ilhan, and Alper Aslan. “Are Fluctuations in Energy Consumption Per Capita Transitory? Evidence from Turkey.” Energy Exploration & Exploitation 29, no. 2 (June 2011): 161–167. doi:10.1260/0144-5987.29.2.161.

Warrad, Taleb M. Awad, and Sameh A. Ajlouni. "Is Jordan Petroleum Refinery Company a Natural Monopoly?." Journal of Applied Economics & Business Research 2, no. 4 (2012).

Kwiatkowski, Denis, Peter C.B. Phillips, Peter Schmidt, and Yongcheol Shin. “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root.” Journal of Econometrics 54, no. 1–3 (October 1992): 159–178. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y.

Dickey, David A., and Wayne A. Fuller. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, no. 366 (June 1979): 427-431. doi:10.2307/2286348.

Perron, Pierre. “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis.” Econometrica 57, no. 6 (November 1989): 1361-1401. doi:10.2307/1913712.

Lee, Junsoo, and Mark C. Strazicich. “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85, no. 4 (November 2003): 1082–1089. doi:10.1162/003465303772815961.

Kumar Narayan, Paresh, and Russell Smyth. “Are Shocks to Energy Consumption Permanent or Temporary? Evidence from 182 Countries.” Energy Policy 35, no. 1 (January 2007): 333–341. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.027.

Kumar Narayan, Paresh, Seema Narayan, and Stephan Popp. “Energy Consumption at the State Level: The Unit Root Null Hypothesis from Australia.” Applied Energy 87, no. 6 (June 2010): 1953–1962. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.022.

Aslan, Alper, and Hakan Kum. “The Stationary of Energy Consumption for Turkish Disaggregate Data by Employing Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests.” Energy 36, no. 7 (July 2011): 4256–4258. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.04.018.

Zivot, Eric, and Donald W. K. Andrews. “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10, no. 3 (July 1992): 251. doi:10.2307/1391541.

Lumsdaine, Robin L., and David H. Papell. “Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit-Root Hypothesis.” Review of Economics and Statistics 79, no. 2 (May 1997): 212–218. doi:10.1162/003465397556791.

Lee, Junsoo, and Mark C. Strazicich. "Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break." Manuscript, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University 33, no. 4 (2004): 2483-2492.

Lee, Junsoo, and Mark C. Strazicich. "Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break." Economics bulletin, 33, no. 4 (2013): 2483-2492.

Narayan, Paresh Kumar, and Stephan Popp. “A New Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks in Level and Slope at Unknown Time.” Journal of Applied Statistics 37, no. 9 (September 2010): 1425–1438. doi:10.1080/02664760903039883.

Mishra, Vinod, and Russell Smyth. “Is Monthly US Natural Gas Consumption Stationary? New Evidence from a GARCH Unit Root Test with Structural Breaks.” Energy Policy 69 (June 2014): 258–262. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.033.

Mishra, Vinod, and Russell Smyth. “Unit root properties of natural gas spot and futures prices: The relevance of heteroskedasticity in high frequency data.” Monash University., Department of Economics, (2014).

Destek, Mehmet Akif, and Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie. “Are Fluctuations in Coal, Oil and Natural Gas Consumption Permanent or Transitory? Evidence from OECD Countries.” Heliyon 6, no. 2 (February 2020): e03391. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03391.

Demir, Ender, and Giray Gozgor. “Are Shocks to Renewable Energy Consumption Permanent or Temporary? Evidence from 54 Developing and Developed Countries.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25, no. 4 (November 24, 2017): 3785–3792. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0801-9.

Akram, Vaseem, Pradipta Kumar Sahoo, and Bhushan Praveen Jangam. “Do Shocks to Electricity Consumption Revert to Its Equilibrium? Evidence from Indian States.” Utilities Policy 61 (December 2019): 100977. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2019.100977.

Aydin, Mucahit, and Ugur Korkut Pata. “Are Shocks to Disaggregated Renewable Energy Consumption Permanent or Temporary for the USA? Wavelet Based Unit Root Test with Smooth Structural Shifts.” Energy 207 (September 2020): 118245. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118245.

Lee, Chien-Chiang, Omid Ranjbar, and Chi-Chuan Lee. “Analyzing the Hysteresis Properties and Growth Stability of Renewable Energy Production of the U.S.” Applied Economics 53, no. 24 (January 24, 2021): 2752–2770. doi:10.1080/00036846.2020.1869168.

Lee, Chien-Chiang, Omid Ranjbar, and Chi-Chuan Lee. “Testing the Persistence of Shocks on Renewable Energy Consumption: Evidence from a Quantile Unit-Root Test with Smooth Breaks.” Energy 215 (January 2021): 119190. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119190.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.28991/esj-2021-01279

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Sameh Ajlouni